top of page


The Arctic 10+ Changed What an Immersion Suit Can Be. Duty of Care Is Why That Should Matter to You.
The Arctic 10+ in Arctic field conditions — built for the days between abandonment and rescue, not just the first hour. Every immersion suit on the market is judged against the same question: does it meet the applicable standard? That's the wrong starting question, and it always has been. The right one is simpler and harder to hide from: if the person wearing this suit actually ends up in the water, or on the ice, does it keep them alive and functional long enough to be found
diego7475
Sep 55 min read


Non-SOLAS Doesn't Mean Non-Vulnerable: What Canada's New Icebreaker Fleet Needs Beyond Minimum Compliance
On August 24, Prime Minister Carney announced an $11 billion contract for six new Polar Class 3 Program Icebreakers, to be built at Chantier Davie in Lévis, Quebec. Each will carry up to 68 crew and program personnel. The first is due in 2032, with the full fleet in service by 2038. It's the largest investment in Canadian icebreaking capability in a generation, and it will keep Canadian Coast Guard crews working in Arctic and sub-Arctic waters for decades to come. It's also a
diego7475
Aug 273 min read


The Classification Society Question: What Recognized Organizations Need to Ask About Polar LSA
When a vessel receives its Polar Ship Certificate, a Recognized Organization certifies that it is fit for polar operations. In most cases, that certification is silent on whether the immersion suits aboard provide thermal protection adequate for the Maximum Expected Time of Rescue. That silence is the question this post is about.
diego7475
Aug 205 min read
bottom of page
